header-logo header-logo

16 June 2021
Issue: 7937 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Solicitors Indemnity Fund given reprieve (for now)

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has announced the extension of the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) for a further year.

The delay means SIF will continue to provide post six-year run-off cover until September 2022 for claims against firms which have closed without a successor practice.

The extension is good news for retired solicitors, some of whom warned the closure of SIF would leave them exposed to the risk of historical claims.

The SRA will now consult on the future of post six-year run-off cover. It warned this week the extension is subject to an affordability test because the fund is deemed beyond the time when a conventional insurance company would have taken steps to bring it to a close.

Anna Bradley, chair of the SRA Board, said: ‘We will need to give careful consideration to finding the right regulatory balance between consumer protection and issues of proportionality, affordability and the wider public interest.’

However, Bradley said she recognised the concerns of the legal profession and the fact the insurance market has hardened, making it more difficult for alternative arrangements to be found.

Post six-year run-off cover is additional to the mandatory six-year run-off cover which the SRA requires firms to have. SIF closed in 2000 when the profession moved to an open market insurance model. It was originally due to close in September 2017, but there have been several extensions since then.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘We have been raising our concerns with the SRA, the regulator for this issue, for more than three years. 

‘We are pleased they are now taking steps to find an effective solution and undertake the detailed analysis required to assess the future of post six-year cover.

‘But it is not enough simply to delay closure again in the hope that next year the commercial indemnity insurance market will change and fill the gap in consumer protection that SIF closure will create. It needs to show imagination in looking at long-term solutions that provide proper levels of consumer protection and do not expose solicitors to ruinous claims or consumers to potentially lengthy and complex litigation.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll