header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors shun courts and plot legal challenge

News

Criminal solicitors could bring a legal challenge against the Legal Services Commission’s (LSC’s) consultation paper on high cost cases.
Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association (CLSA) chair Ian Kelcey says he does not think the consultation, Very High Cost Case Panel, published last week, is adequate.

“It is not a consultation paper, but the LSC expects the profession to respond on it. This is something we might judicially review, and that line of action will be actively considered,” he says. “Practitioners are feeling used and abused by the government, who hasn’t listened to them, and who consistently ignore what the profession is saying.

“The proposals are now more draconian than Lord Carter’s—he proposed a fund to assist firms in making the changes but the government has withdrawn that from the plans.”

Striking criminal solicitors staged two days of disruptive action across the country last week in protest at reforms to the legal aid system. In south Cumbria, dozens of cases were reportedly adjourned as solicitors stayed away from the courts. The solicitors were protesting against low legal aid fees, as well as the Carter reforms, which will introduce price competitive tendering and drive many firms out of business or force them to merge.
The protest was not organised by the CLSA, although it gave its approval.
A spokesperson for the Department for Constitutional Affairs condemned the strike action. “We are disappointed that a small number of solicitors opted to carry out forms of disruptive action at the end of last week.

“Lord Falconer has previously urged solicitors not to take disruptive action and we strongly believe that by doing so, solicitors are not acting in their clients’ best interests.

“As with previous action this disruption has been limited and not nationwide, in most areas it has been business as usual and we hope the vast majority of lawyers will continue to provide a full service for their clients. Disrupting the criminal justice system and harming the interests of victims, defendants and the court system is unnecessary and irresponsible.”

Andrew Keogh, partner, Tuckers Solicitors, retorts: “Striking per se does not raise any ethical issues. We saw quite widespread action last week but existing client work was still protected, for example, solicitors set up agents’ arrangements at every magistrates’ court in London so there was at least one solicitor there.

“Therefore, the rights of vulnerable people were once again protected by the profession. The courts operated slowly but cases weren’t adjourned so the impact on the public was minimal.”

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll