header-logo header-logo

Solicitors slated for offensive and ‘despicable’ behaviour online

01 September 2017
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors have been warned against sending offensive emails or letters, or making offensive social media posts, after a spate of incidents.

In a warning notice last week, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) took the unusual step of urging solicitors to make sure their communications are always professional, lawful and do not cause offence. It specifically warned that online comments posted in a personal capacity and which might be deemed offensive or inappropriate could be classed as misconduct if the poster can be identified as a solicitor.

The SRA issued the notice following an increase in reports of solicitors falling below expected standards.

One solicitor sent a string of offensive late-night tweets, leading to a rebuke. Another solicitor was fined £25,000 by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal after making comments on Facebook that he admitted were ‘offensive’ and ‘wholly inappropriate’.

Three solicitors at the same firm who exchanged offensive emails about a colleague were fined a total of £14,000 and ordered to pay more than £7,000 of costs. A solicitor was fined £15,000 for emailing a client using language described as ‘despicable’ by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT).

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘Public confidence in the profession is undermined by offensive or inappropriate communication and the misuse of social media can be a real problem.

‘But this is also about communication within an office or to clients. Solicitors cannot justify their conduct by saying that the communication was private, or they did not intend to cause offence, or that recipients were not offended.’

Issue: 7759 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll