header-logo header-logo

01 September 2017
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors slated for offensive and ‘despicable’ behaviour online

Solicitors have been warned against sending offensive emails or letters, or making offensive social media posts, after a spate of incidents.

In a warning notice last week, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) took the unusual step of urging solicitors to make sure their communications are always professional, lawful and do not cause offence. It specifically warned that online comments posted in a personal capacity and which might be deemed offensive or inappropriate could be classed as misconduct if the poster can be identified as a solicitor.

The SRA issued the notice following an increase in reports of solicitors falling below expected standards.

One solicitor sent a string of offensive late-night tweets, leading to a rebuke. Another solicitor was fined £25,000 by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal after making comments on Facebook that he admitted were ‘offensive’ and ‘wholly inappropriate’.

Three solicitors at the same firm who exchanged offensive emails about a colleague were fined a total of £14,000 and ordered to pay more than £7,000 of costs. A solicitor was fined £15,000 for emailing a client using language described as ‘despicable’ by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT).

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘Public confidence in the profession is undermined by offensive or inappropriate communication and the misuse of social media can be a real problem.

‘But this is also about communication within an office or to clients. Solicitors cannot justify their conduct by saying that the communication was private, or they did not intend to cause offence, or that recipients were not offended.’

Issue: 7759 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll