header-logo header-logo

28 November 2016
Issue: 7725 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Solicitors struggle with budgeting

Only two per cent of costs lawyers have worked with solicitors who always stick to their budgets, a survey by the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) has found.

Of 117 costs lawyers surveyed, 72% said solicitors “sometimes” went over their budgets and 22% said this always happened.

The research suggests that one reason for this may be that budgeting takes place too early on in proceedings. Half (51%) of costs lawyers agreed that instead of doing it at the first case management conference, the hearing should be held later, once the course of the litigation is clearer.

Solicitors are also failing to update their budgets as the case progresses—nearly a third of costs lawyers (32%) have never seen an application to update a budget, and only 18% reported an increase in number of budget update applications.

ACL chairman Iain Stark said: “We are more than three years into costs budgeting and the reality is that—while it has been of benefit in some instances—it has not delivered in the way that was hoped.

“This is, at least in part, because many solicitors have still not properly engaged with the process, even though they risk court sanctions as a result. The alternative, as laid out starkly by the senior judiciary recently, is fixed costs for cases worth up to £250,000—a figure that covers the vast majority of litigation in England and Wales.

“Maybe this is the shock solicitors need to get serious about costs budgeting. Costs lawyers stand ready to help them.”

Issue: 7725 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll