header-logo header-logo

22 February 2013 / Adrian White
Issue: 7549 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Sound advice

How should electronic audio data be handled and how can it be included into the eDisclosure process? Adrian White reports

The challenges for many organisations and their lawyers presented by the explosion of electronic information are well-documented. When the regulators come to call, identifying, collating and evaluating large quantities of emails, word processed documents, and other electronic records requires a micro level of management and cutting-edge technology to make sense of it all. However, what has proven rather more difficult is data that is recorded and stored in audio rather than written form.

The traditional way of dealing with a disclosure order or regulatory request involving recorded audio is for a lawyer team or litigation support professional to listen to every minute of potentially relevant material, often more than once, and to identify and transcribe the important bits. However, this can be a labour-intensive and expensive processes as organisations continue to be required to retain more material. It is also inherently inaccurate.

Incorporating audio

Fortunately, search technology has evolved to address this problem,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll