header-logo header-logo

Sound advice

22 February 2013 / Adrian White
Issue: 7549 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

How should electronic audio data be handled and how can it be included into the eDisclosure process? Adrian White reports

The challenges for many organisations and their lawyers presented by the explosion of electronic information are well-documented. When the regulators come to call, identifying, collating and evaluating large quantities of emails, word processed documents, and other electronic records requires a micro level of management and cutting-edge technology to make sense of it all. However, what has proven rather more difficult is data that is recorded and stored in audio rather than written form.

The traditional way of dealing with a disclosure order or regulatory request involving recorded audio is for a lawyer team or litigation support professional to listen to every minute of potentially relevant material, often more than once, and to identify and transcribe the important bits. However, this can be a labour-intensive and expensive processes as organisations continue to be required to retain more material. It is also inherently inaccurate.

Incorporating audio

Fortunately, search technology has evolved to address this problem,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

Francis Ho, Charles Russell Speechlys partner, was recently appointed chair of the Construction Law Committee of the City of London Law Society. He discusses the challenges of learning to lead, the importance of professional ethics, and the power of the written word, withNLJ

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
back-to-top-scroll