header-logo header-logo

04 June 2009
Issue: 7372 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Southall loses appeal

Professional misconduct

Dr David Southall, the paediatrician whose expert evidence led to the wrongful conviction of solicitor Sally Clark, has lost his appeal against a decision to strike him off the medical register for serious professional misconduct.

In 2004, Southall was found guilty of abusing his professional position by accusing Stephen Clark of murdering his children on the basis of an interview Clark gave in a television documentary. Clark’s wife, Sally, was convicted of murder but cleared on appeal in 2003. She died in 2007.

In 2007, the Fitness to Practise Panel of the General Medical Council found Southall guilty of serious professional misconduct and directed that his name be erased from the register of medical practitioners.

The panel found that Southall had “deep seated attitudinal problems” and that his misconduct was so serious that it was “fundamentally incompatible” with his continuing in medical practice.

Southall appealed, contending that the panel was wrong to make certain findings of fact that were central to the conclusion of serious professional conduct and was wrong to impose erasure, the most severe sanction available.

Delivering judgment in Southall v General Medical Council [2009] EWHC 1155 (Admin), Mr Justice Blake said: “Dr Southall’s conduct was not a mere error of judgment in a challenging environment where there may have been few established principles for guidance. “Nor was this a one-off failure with respect to the treatment of parents whose conduct had come under scrutiny.

Issue: 7372 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll