header-logo header-logo

27 January 2011
Issue: 7450 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Special procedure child dispute

A petition pleads a child as a non-child of the family but in his acknowledgement of service...

A petition pleads a child as a non-child of the family but in his acknowledgement of service the respondent contends that the child is a child of the family. No answer is filed. Can the case proceed in the special procedure list on the basis that the child is not a child of the family? 

No. The issue has wide implications and would need to be determined before certification of entitlement to a decree under the special procedure. Almost certainly, the district judge would list a directions hearing on the issue which the parties would be required to attend. Confusion by the parties or one of them often arises because of ignorance of the fact that a child is of the family if treated as such although one of the parties is not a biological parent. Problems also commonly arise where there is an inconsistency between the petition (drafted by solicitors) and the statement of arrangements (completed by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll