header-logo header-logo

27 January 2011
Issue: 7450 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Special procedure child dispute

A petition pleads a child as a non-child of the family but in his acknowledgement of service...

A petition pleads a child as a non-child of the family but in his acknowledgement of service the respondent contends that the child is a child of the family. No answer is filed. Can the case proceed in the special procedure list on the basis that the child is not a child of the family? 

No. The issue has wide implications and would need to be determined before certification of entitlement to a decree under the special procedure. Almost certainly, the district judge would list a directions hearing on the issue which the parties would be required to attend. Confusion by the parties or one of them often arises because of ignorance of the fact that a child is of the family if treated as such although one of the parties is not a biological parent. Problems also commonly arise where there is an inconsistency between the petition (drafted by solicitors) and the statement of arrangements (completed by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll