header-logo header-logo

27 January 2011
Issue: 7450 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Special procedure child dispute

A petition pleads a child as a non-child of the family but in his acknowledgement of service...

A petition pleads a child as a non-child of the family but in his acknowledgement of service the respondent contends that the child is a child of the family. No answer is filed. Can the case proceed in the special procedure list on the basis that the child is not a child of the family? 

No. The issue has wide implications and would need to be determined before certification of entitlement to a decree under the special procedure. Almost certainly, the district judge would list a directions hearing on the issue which the parties would be required to attend. Confusion by the parties or one of them often arises because of ignorance of the fact that a child is of the family if treated as such although one of the parties is not a biological parent. Problems also commonly arise where there is an inconsistency between the petition (drafted by solicitors) and the statement of arrangements (completed by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll