header-logo header-logo

17 May 2007 / Peter Gooderham
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Special treatment?

Peter Gooderham dissects the government’s proposed NHS redress scheme…and finds it wanting

The NHS Redress Act 2006 (NHSRA 2006) received Royal Assent on 8 November 2006. This provides for the establishment of the NHS redress scheme, which will be an alternative means of compensation to the clinical negligence system for some potential claimants. The details of the scheme will be contained within statutory instruments. NHSRA 2006 implements some of the recommendations of Making Amends (Department of Health, 2003).

The reliance on statutory instruments is a major feature of NHSRA 2006. They will be a source of interest to clinical negligence lawyers. The Department of Health seemingly wishes to consult before producing these.

DELIVERY OF TORT REFORM

Making Amends followed several calls for tort reform, notably from Sir Ian Kennedy in Learning from Bristol (Department of Health, 2001, Cm 5207), who recommended replacement of the clinical negligence system with a no-fault compensation scheme. NHSRA 2006, however, specifically requires, in s 1(2), a “qualifying liability in tort”. The government has preserved the Bolam/Bolitho test of the standard of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll