header-logo header-logo

17 May 2007 / Peter Gooderham
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Special treatment?

Peter Gooderham dissects the government’s proposed NHS redress scheme…and finds it wanting

The NHS Redress Act 2006 (NHSRA 2006) received Royal Assent on 8 November 2006. This provides for the establishment of the NHS redress scheme, which will be an alternative means of compensation to the clinical negligence system for some potential claimants. The details of the scheme will be contained within statutory instruments. NHSRA 2006 implements some of the recommendations of Making Amends (Department of Health, 2003).

The reliance on statutory instruments is a major feature of NHSRA 2006. They will be a source of interest to clinical negligence lawyers. The Department of Health seemingly wishes to consult before producing these.

DELIVERY OF TORT REFORM

Making Amends followed several calls for tort reform, notably from Sir Ian Kennedy in Learning from Bristol (Department of Health, 2001, Cm 5207), who recommended replacement of the clinical negligence system with a no-fault compensation scheme. NHSRA 2006, however, specifically requires, in s 1(2), a “qualifying liability in tort”. The government has preserved the Bolam/Bolitho test of the standard of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll