header-logo header-logo

Spies, lies & dirty money

20 July 2020
Issue: 7896 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
The long-awaited ‘Russia report’ has called for new legislation to ‘tackle espionage, the illicit financial dealings of the Russian elite and the “enablers” who support this activity’

The Official Secrets Act regime is out of date and ‘not fit for purpose’, according to the 55-page report by the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) into Kremlin influence, simply titled ‘Russia’.

‘Crucially, it is not illegal to be a foreign agent in this country,’ the report states. The outcome of a 2017 Law Commission consultation on a new Espionage Act is ‘still awaited’.

One specific issue an Espionage Act could address is ‘individuals acting on behalf of a foreign power and seeking to obfuscate this link’. The report refers to the US Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), which dates back to the 1930s and requires everyone who represents the interests of a foreign power apart from accredited diplomats to register with the authorities and provide information about activities and finances. There is no UK equivalent.

In evidence to the ISC, the director-general of MI5 said FARA-type legislation would create ‘the basis therefore of being able to pursue under criminal means somebody not declaring, thereby being undercover… today, it is not an offence in any sense to be a covert agent … unless you acquire damaging secrets and give them to your masters’.

While unexplained wealth orders were introduced in January 2018 and can be applied to assets valued at more than £50,000, they ‘may not be that useful in relation to the Russian elite’… moreover, ‘there are practical issues around their use’. The report quotes the director general of the National Crime Agency, ‘Russians have been investing for a long period of time… you can track back and you can see how they will make a case in court that their wealth is not unexplained, it is very clearly explained’.

The report states there are ‘similar concerns in relation to sanctions’.

Issue: 7896 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll