header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Sporting chance

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
16 September 2007 / Mike Morgan
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Ensuring the good governance of sports while keeping them autonomous is an unenviable task. Mike Morgan reports

The European Commission’s White Paper on Sport was published on 11 July 2007. The paper confirms the Commission’s position that sports activity, insofar as it constitutes an economic activity, does not fall outside the bounds of EU law. The paper will be seen by some sports stakeholders as an erosion of the autonomy of sport as the EU gets ever closer to developing a legal competence for sport.

AUTONOMY OF SPORT

The paper follows on from the Nice Declaration 2000 on the Specific Characteristics of Sport and its Social Function in Europe and José Luis Arnaut’s 2006 Independent European Sport Review, both of which are relevant to the so-called autonomy of sport. Paragraph 7 of the Nice Declaration said:

“The European Council stresses its support for the independence of sports organisations and their right to organise themselves through appropriate associative structures. It recognise that, with due regard for national and Community legislation and on the basis of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
NLJ this week: Failure to deliver in Getty v Stability AI
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
NLJ this week: Spotlight on the Supreme Court in 2025
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll