header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
16 September 2007 / Mike Morgan
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Sporting chance

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Ensuring the good governance of sports while keeping them autonomous is an unenviable task. Mike Morgan reports

The European Commission’s White Paper on Sport was published on 11 July 2007. The paper confirms the Commission’s position that sports activity, insofar as it constitutes an economic activity, does not fall outside the bounds of EU law. The paper will be seen by some sports stakeholders as an erosion of the autonomy of sport as the EU gets ever closer to developing a legal competence for sport.

AUTONOMY OF SPORT

The paper follows on from the Nice Declaration 2000 on the Specific Characteristics of Sport and its Social Function in Europe and José Luis Arnaut’s 2006 Independent European Sport Review, both of which are relevant to the so-called autonomy of sport. Paragraph 7 of the Nice Declaration said:

“The European Council stresses its support for the independence of sports organisations and their right to organise themselves through appropriate associative structures. It recognise that, with due regard for national and Community legislation and on the basis of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Newcastle & North of England Law Society—Lesley Fairclough

Newcastle & North of England Law Society—Lesley Fairclough

Ward Hadaway partner becomes bicentennial president following regional merger

Devonshires—four promotions

Devonshires—four promotions

Firm promotes four senior associates to partner in annual round

Fieldfisher—John McElroy & Daniel Hayward

Fieldfisher—John McElroy & Daniel Hayward

Co-heads of dispute resolution practice appointed alongside partner promotions

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll