header-logo header-logo

25 October 2018
Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Training & education
printer mail-detail

SQE Toolkit launched

City solicitors have launched the SQE Toolkit, a practical guide to navigating the upcoming changes to legal training and qualification. The City of London Law Society’s (CLLS) initiative is designed to help City law firms prepare for the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE), which could be introduce as early as September 2020. It outlines key questions, includes insights from training providers and offers advice. Hannah Kozlova Lindsay, of the CLLS, said: ‘The proposed changes to how we train and develop our lawyers have a broader strategic significance and managing them will be vital to ensuring City law firms are genuinely future-proof.’

Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Training & education
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll