header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
30 November 2012 / Sarah Johnson
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Square deal or raw deal?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Sarah Johnson concludes that the devil will be in the detail of employee owner contracts

Plans for the creation of a completely new kind of employment arrangement, the employee owner contract, were announced recently by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne.

Consultation on the proposals ended on 8 November 2012. The government aims to provide a response within three months of that date. Rather ominously, the consultation says that the government wishes “to ensure there are no unintended consequences” of the new rules. The plan is to allow companies to use the new contracts from April 2013.

Under employee owner contracts, employees will surrender some of their employment rights in exchange for shares in the business they work for, worth between £2,000 and £50,000.
Employee owner contracts will be available alongside standard employment, worker (including agency worker) or self-employed contracts. The Employment Rights Act 1996 will be amended to create this new kind of employment status.

The government suggests that the new status ensures companies can reduce the risks of employment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll