header-logo header-logo

30 November 2012 / Sarah Johnson
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Square deal or raw deal?

Sarah Johnson concludes that the devil will be in the detail of employee owner contracts

Plans for the creation of a completely new kind of employment arrangement, the employee owner contract, were announced recently by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne.

Consultation on the proposals ended on 8 November 2012. The government aims to provide a response within three months of that date. Rather ominously, the consultation says that the government wishes “to ensure there are no unintended consequences” of the new rules. The plan is to allow companies to use the new contracts from April 2013.

Under employee owner contracts, employees will surrender some of their employment rights in exchange for shares in the business they work for, worth between £2,000 and £50,000.
Employee owner contracts will be available alongside standard employment, worker (including agency worker) or self-employed contracts. The Employment Rights Act 1996 will be amended to create this new kind of employment status.

The government suggests that the new status ensures companies can reduce the risks of employment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll