header-logo header-logo

SRA proposes tighter safeguards on client money

20 November 2024
Issue: 8095 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
Solicitors could lose their right to handle client money, following the Axiom Ince debacle.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) launched proposals last week to install tighter safeguards on client money. These include reducing client money held by solicitors, introducing more checks and controls on client money that is held, and reforming payments to, and reimbursements from, the Compensation Fund.

About 7,000 firms (75%) held client money in the year to August 2023, SRA figures show, for reasons ranging from a house purchase to settlements paid for personal injury.

The SRA says it has heard concerns about potential conflicts when managing partners also hold key compliance roles.

It reports hearing from some firms that they rely on income generated from interest earned on client accounts, which may incentivise firms to hold more money than necessary and for longer than needed. One option under consideration is stopping firms retaining any interest earned.

However, Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘Firms should continue to be able to operate client accounts, as they are vital for the effective and efficient delivery of many legal services.  

‘There is a danger that radical change will add cost and delay for clients and simply transfer the same or even greater risk from the current client accounts system to any new one. 

‘Following the Legal Services Board’s decision to take enforcement action after its independent review into the SRA’s handling of the collapse of Axiom Ince, a key question that must be asked is how the SRA can improve its own monitoring and enforcement around these kinds of risks as part of its core regulatory function. Simply passing regulatory responsibility elsewhere is unlikely to be the answer.’  

The SRA consultation, ‘Client money in legal services—safeguarding consumers and providing redress’, runs until 21 February 2025.

Issue: 8095 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll