header-logo header-logo

09 November 2022
Issue: 8002 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Fraud , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

SRA reports on money laundering raids

Regulators made 163 visits to law firms in connection with suspected anti-money laundering breaches last year, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has reported.

The SRA also held 109 desk-based reviews. In total, there were 51 ‘enforcement outcomes’ in relation to money laundering—29 fines (totalling £286,976); nine letters of advice; four rebukes or reprimands; and one finding and warning. It also made 20 suspicious activity reports to the National Crime Agency, involving £149m of potential criminal funds, and there were eight Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal prosecutions.

The SRA’s Anti Money Laundering annual report 2021-22, published in October, also highlights the most common breaches such as poor client due diligence and failure to have an adequate firm-wide risk assessment.

Writing in the foreword, SRA chair Anna Bradley said the regulator had ‘significantly increased the resource we dedicate to preventing and detecting money laundering in the last year’, including identifying a sample of firms with exposure to the Russian market and screening their client lists for ‘designated persons’.

Issue: 8002 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Fraud , Regulatory
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll