header-logo header-logo

SRA: Restricting fees in financial mis-selling claims

12 July 2021
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Financial services litigation
printer mail-detail
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has invited solicitors and law firm representatives to give their views on fee restrictions for financial product and services mis-selling compensation cases

It launched a discussion paper, ‘Restricting fees for some claims management services’, this week, setting out its approach and asking to what extent its rules should be aligned with the proposals of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which regulates the vast majority of this sector.

Under the Financial Guidance and Claims Act 2018, the SRA’s rules must prevent excessive fees being charged for claims management activities connected to financial products or services.

Paul Philip, SRA Chief Executive, said: ‘This is an important piece of work for consumers and the firms we regulate.

‘Fees have to be set at a level that means the cost is affordable for people seeking redress, while ensuring that this is still a viable area of work for firms that provide this service for those who need it. So although the number of law firms involved may be small, the impacts for consumers could be significant.

‘I would urge firms currentlyproviding claims management in this area, and others who may be thinking about doing so, to read the discussion paper and let us know what you think.’

View the discussion paper at bit.ly/3xvpg5N and submit your views by 29 September.

The SRA will hold a webinar on its thinking in this area, on 14 July at 12.30pm. Register here: bit.ly/3hTYz4m.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll