header-logo header-logo

12 July 2021
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Financial services litigation
printer mail-detail

SRA: Restricting fees in financial mis-selling claims

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has invited solicitors and law firm representatives to give their views on fee restrictions for financial product and services mis-selling compensation cases

It launched a discussion paper, ‘Restricting fees for some claims management services’, this week, setting out its approach and asking to what extent its rules should be aligned with the proposals of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which regulates the vast majority of this sector.

Under the Financial Guidance and Claims Act 2018, the SRA’s rules must prevent excessive fees being charged for claims management activities connected to financial products or services.

Paul Philip, SRA Chief Executive, said: ‘This is an important piece of work for consumers and the firms we regulate.

‘Fees have to be set at a level that means the cost is affordable for people seeking redress, while ensuring that this is still a viable area of work for firms that provide this service for those who need it. So although the number of law firms involved may be small, the impacts for consumers could be significant.

‘I would urge firms currentlyproviding claims management in this area, and others who may be thinking about doing so, to read the discussion paper and let us know what you think.’

View the discussion paper at bit.ly/3xvpg5N and submit your views by 29 September.

The SRA will hold a webinar on its thinking in this area, on 14 July at 12.30pm. Register here: bit.ly/3hTYz4m.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll