header-logo header-logo

29 November 2022
Issue: 8005 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Immigration & asylum , Legal services
printer mail-detail

SRA uncovers immigration law shortcomings

Ten firms out of 40 taking part in a Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) thematic review of immigration services providers have been referred to disciplinary processes after ‘significant shortcomings’ were found.

Issues uncovered included poor record-keeping, failures to keep proper training records and a reluctance to report potential misconduct at other firms—which is a regulatory requirement.

In response, the SRA has published additional guidance on supervision of staff, and will carry out a follow-up review in 12-18 months.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘This is an area of work which needs providers to be up to date in what is often a challenging landscape.

‘Our recent review found lots of good practice in solicitor firms. It also showed that there are areas where some firms need to do better.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll