header-logo header-logo

24 September 2020 / Chris Williams
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Staking a claim: contesting a will

28047
Chris Williams discusses a court’s approach to a 1975 Act claim

In brief

  • Re H (deceased) SH v NH and another [2020] EWHC 1134 (Fam): a 1975 Act claim against an estate for reasonable financial provision.

In Re H (deceased) SH v NH and another [2020] EWHC 1134 (Fam), [2020] All ER (D) 86 (May) the claimant (C) made a 1975 Act claim against the estate of her late father (F) (who died in 2016) for reasonable financial provision. F’s estate was calculated at £554,000, being F’s half share of the property owned jointly with his wife (£350,000), a half share in joint accounts with his wife (£63,000) and the executor’s account (£141,000).

The defendants were C’s mother (D1) and C’s brother (D2), as executor of his late father’s estate.

  • C and D2 were the only children of the marriage and D1 was the sole beneficiary of F’s estate.
  • D1 was aged 80, had extensive health problems, was profoundly deaf, lived in a care home
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll