header-logo header-logo

Staking a claim: contesting a will

24 September 2020 / Chris Williams
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
28047
Chris Williams discusses a court’s approach to a 1975 Act claim

In brief

  • Re H (deceased) SH v NH and another [2020] EWHC 1134 (Fam): a 1975 Act claim against an estate for reasonable financial provision.

In Re H (deceased) SH v NH and another [2020] EWHC 1134 (Fam), [2020] All ER (D) 86 (May) the claimant (C) made a 1975 Act claim against the estate of her late father (F) (who died in 2016) for reasonable financial provision. F’s estate was calculated at £554,000, being F’s half share of the property owned jointly with his wife (£350,000), a half share in joint accounts with his wife (£63,000) and the executor’s account (£141,000).

The defendants were C’s mother (D1) and C’s brother (D2), as executor of his late father’s estate.

  • C and D2 were the only children of the marriage and D1 was the sole beneficiary of F’s estate.
  • D1 was aged 80, had extensive health problems, was profoundly deaf, lived in a care home and was worried
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll