header-logo header-logo

15 July 2010 / Paola Fudakowska , Adam Cloherty , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

State of origin

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska & Adam Cloherty outline the impact of globalisation on will settlement

Holliday v Musa EWCA Civ 335; [2010] All ER (D) 288 (CA) is another reminder of the challenges for trusts and estates law thrown up by an increasingly globalised world. Just a few years after the decision in Agulian v Cyganik [2006] 8 ITELR 762, the Court of Appeal has again grappled with the issue of a deceased’s domicile in the context of a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. As in Agulian, the Musa case concerned a deceased (D) with a Cypriot domicile of origin who had lived in the UK for most of his adult life, having moved to the UK in 1958 and resided here until his death. D had for some years cohabited with the claimant (C), an English woman, with whom he had a 10-year-old son, although D also had adult children by a Cypriot wife with whom he had initially come to the UK but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll