header-logo header-logo

15 July 2010 / Paola Fudakowska , Adam Cloherty , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

State of origin

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska & Adam Cloherty outline the impact of globalisation on will settlement

Holliday v Musa EWCA Civ 335; [2010] All ER (D) 288 (CA) is another reminder of the challenges for trusts and estates law thrown up by an increasingly globalised world. Just a few years after the decision in Agulian v Cyganik [2006] 8 ITELR 762, the Court of Appeal has again grappled with the issue of a deceased’s domicile in the context of a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. As in Agulian, the Musa case concerned a deceased (D) with a Cypriot domicile of origin who had lived in the UK for most of his adult life, having moved to the UK in 1958 and resided here until his death. D had for some years cohabited with the claimant (C), an English woman, with whom he had a 10-year-old son, although D also had adult children by a Cypriot wife with whom he had initially come to the UK but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll