header-logo header-logo

State of play

21 June 2012 / Andrew Otchie
Issue: 7519 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Andrew Otchie discusses the technicalities & legal aspects of enforcing a judgment from a Commonwealth jurisdiction

The conclusion of the Second World War brought about the beginning of the end for the Empire of Great Britain, with India declaring independence in 1947, followed by the Gold Coast, which was the first African country to do so, then becoming known thereafter as Ghana, in 1957. Thus, with the number of countries which then followed suit, a political community was born in 1952, being known as the British Commonwealth, and referring to the 54 states, almost a third of the world’s population, which wished to continue their common traditions and shared cultural heritage. Significantly, the legal systems that had been implemented and adhered to throughout the Empire, were firmly based on English law, and now at the 60th anniversary year of the formation of the Commonwealth, largely continue to be so. 


Enforcing a judgment from a Commonwealth jurisdiction 

The historical context is relevant because, at the time the Administration of Justice Act was passed
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll