header-logo header-logo

Statements of truth

20 January 2009 / Janna Purdie
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Janna Purdie highlights the importance of ensuring witnesses understand the consequences of providing false information supported by a statement of truth
 

Statements of truth
Statements of truth must not be regarded as a mere formality. Yet in practice do practitioners clearly explain the consequences of giving false information supported by a statement of truth? Certainly in the case of KJM Motorbikes v Hinton, which came before the Court of Appeal last week, the answer would appear to be no.

In that case, the Court of Appeal emphasised the importance of making witnesses aware of the dangers they face in such circumstances. Th e witness’s contempt of court had been deemed serious by the first instance court but permission for contempt of court proceedings were unsuccessful as the judge’s view was that such proceedings would not benefi t the administration of justice. Th e Court of Appeal disagreed. In its judgment, which all practitioners should take note of, it is clear that courts should, in the future, take a more stringent line in deciding whether

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll