header-logo header-logo

20 January 2009 / Janna Purdie
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Statements of truth

Janna Purdie highlights the importance of ensuring witnesses understand the consequences of providing false information supported by a statement of truth
 

Statements of truth
Statements of truth must not be regarded as a mere formality. Yet in practice do practitioners clearly explain the consequences of giving false information supported by a statement of truth? Certainly in the case of KJM Motorbikes v Hinton, which came before the Court of Appeal last week, the answer would appear to be no.

In that case, the Court of Appeal emphasised the importance of making witnesses aware of the dangers they face in such circumstances. Th e witness’s contempt of court had been deemed serious by the first instance court but permission for contempt of court proceedings were unsuccessful as the judge’s view was that such proceedings would not benefi t the administration of justice. Th e Court of Appeal disagreed. In its judgment, which all practitioners should take note of, it is clear that courts should, in the future, take a more stringent line in deciding whether

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll