header-logo header-logo

Statistics point to a healthy bench

01 March 2018
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judges rarely get ill, with considerably fewer sick days recorded compared to the average for civil servants, according to evidence supplied by the judiciary to the Senior Salaries Review Board. No Court of Appeal judge has taken a sick day in the past two years. Similarly, no Recorder, Judge Advocate or Deputy Judge Advocate has taken a day off sick in the past two years. Seven High Court judges took a total of 393 days off in 2016/17 but no sick days are recorded for 2015/2016. Circuit Judges had suffered the most—156 judges took 3,079 days off in 2015/16 and 185 judges were ill on 3,410 days in 2016/17. In total, across the judiciary, 9,965 days were lost due to sickness absence last year, and 9, 321 in 2015/16.

Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll