header-logo header-logo

01 March 2018
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Statistics point to a healthy bench

Judges rarely get ill, with considerably fewer sick days recorded compared to the average for civil servants, according to evidence supplied by the judiciary to the Senior Salaries Review Board. No Court of Appeal judge has taken a sick day in the past two years. Similarly, no Recorder, Judge Advocate or Deputy Judge Advocate has taken a day off sick in the past two years. Seven High Court judges took a total of 393 days off in 2016/17 but no sick days are recorded for 2015/2016. Circuit Judges had suffered the most—156 judges took 3,079 days off in 2015/16 and 185 judges were ill on 3,410 days in 2016/17. In total, across the judiciary, 9,965 days were lost due to sickness absence last year, and 9, 321 in 2015/16.

Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP strengthens Commercial practice with a new partner

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons welcomes Francesca Brown to Family team

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires

NEWS
A wide-ranging Civil Way column highlights developments from insolvency procedure to employment law, but one case stands out for its lessons on bankruptcy, family homes and digital communications
A sprawling Intellectual Property Office battle between House of Fraser and Frasers Property has delivered a masterclass in modern trade mark law
Courts in England and Wales and Singapore are increasingly confronting complex disputes over international child relocation as families become more globally mobile
The government’s long-awaited family law reform consultation could mark a turning point for domestic abuse victims navigating financial remedy proceedings, but significant challenges remain
A new commercial court pilot giving the public access to documents used in hearings, including expert reports, is raising difficult questions about transparency and privacy
back-to-top-scroll