header-logo header-logo

Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors (Amendment) Regulations 2011 (SI 2011/1856)

03 August 2011
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Amend the Companies Act 2006 and the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2007, SI 2007/1856...

Commencement date
Partly on 1 September 2011; Partly on 1 October 2011; Fully on 31 July 2013

Summary

Amend the Companies Act 2006 and the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2007, SI 2007/1856, to implement Commission Dec 2011/30/EU on the equivalence of certain third country for auditors and audit entities as well as a transitional period for audit activities of certain third country auditors and audit entities in the EU. Include the following auditor systems:

  • public oversight
  • quality assurance
  • investigation, and;
  • penalty systems

Provide a new shorter list of third countries that are subject to transitional arrangements. Introduce equivalence arrangements for the first time for certain third countries which previously had transitional status. Make technical changes to the arrangements and the way in which they and the equivalence arrangements apply.

Extend the requirements for monitoring of statutory audits, by the Recognised Supervisory Bodies and the Audit Inspection Unit

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll