header-logo header-logo

Statutory failures

11 February 2010 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7404 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Complying with DDA 1995 duties means more than ticking the right boxes, says Nicholas Dobson

The reach of local authority duties under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) is now very extensive. So authorities that ignore or pay inadequate regard to them proceed at their peril. A stark judicial reminder of this came last December from His Honour Judge Milwyn Jarman QC in the Administrative Court in the conjoined cases of R (Boyejo and others) v Barnet London Borough Council and R (Smith) v Portsmouth Borough Council [2009] EWHC 3261 (Admin), [2009] All ER (D) 169 (Dec).

In both cases the authorities had decided to change the way they provided support services to residents of sheltered accommodation in their areas. Barnet had resolved to terminate contracts for on-site warden-based services and to develop a peripatetic support service with the retention of an alarm service to all residents in such accommodation.

Portsmouth Council’s decision was to terminate the provision for sleep-in night staff at each of its sheltered housing schemes within the category providing for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Manchester firm strengthens Court of Protection expertise with partner hire

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Agricultural law team expands with senior director appointments

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll