header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
31 March 2023 / Jon Felce , Mikhail Vishnyakov
Issue: 8019 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

Arbitration Act 1996: staying ‘best in class’

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
117272
Jon Felce and Mikhail Vishnyakov discuss proposed changes to the Arbitration Act 1996
  • Sets out and discusses five key proposed reforms to Law Commission proposals for changes to the Arbitration Act 1996.
  • Outlines some proposed minor proposals, as well as the areas where no change is proposed.

The Law Commission is reviewing the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) for changes that may be needed to maintain its reputation for being ‘best in class’.

The provisional amendments (published in late 2022) aim to reflect the trends that have evolved in international arbitration, and potential improvements that have been identified to certain provisions of AA 1996, since its enactment more than 25 years ago.

As outlined in this article, the proposals are limited and carefully targeted. This suggests that, post-reform, many stakeholders will continue to regard AA 1996 highly. The consultation closed in December 2022 and the Law Commission aims to publish its final recommendations by mid-2023. Five key provisional proposals are set out below.

Summary determination

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: CPR tweak closes third-party disclosure gap
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
NLJ this week: Court of Appeals wrestles with Mazur fallout
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll