header-logo header-logo

Arbitration Act 1996: staying ‘best in class’

31 March 2023 / Jon Felce , Mikhail Vishnyakov
Issue: 8019 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail
117272
Jon Felce and Mikhail Vishnyakov discuss proposed changes to the Arbitration Act 1996
  • Sets out and discusses five key proposed reforms to Law Commission proposals for changes to the Arbitration Act 1996.
  • Outlines some proposed minor proposals, as well as the areas where no change is proposed.

The Law Commission is reviewing the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) for changes that may be needed to maintain its reputation for being ‘best in class’.

The provisional amendments (published in late 2022) aim to reflect the trends that have evolved in international arbitration, and potential improvements that have been identified to certain provisions of AA 1996, since its enactment more than 25 years ago.

As outlined in this article, the proposals are limited and carefully targeted. This suggests that, post-reform, many stakeholders will continue to regard AA 1996 highly. The consultation closed in December 2022 and the Law Commission aims to publish its final recommendations by mid-2023. Five key provisional proposals are set out below.

Summary determination

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll