header-logo header-logo

12 February 2009
Issue: 7356 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Stemming a rising tide?

Tom Bailey & Greg Williams consider the effectiveness of the new mortgage possession pre-action protocol

'There are no specific consequences where a party is in breach of the protocol'

As any practitioner who has witnessed a possession list in their local county court will know, claims for possession are rising steeply, thanks in no small part to the “credit crunch”. Statistics recently published by the Ministry of Justice state that during the third quarter of 2008, 38,511 possession claims were issued, resulting in 29,516 possession orders being made, of which 47% were suspended possession orders.
Following consultation, a mortgage possession pre-action protocol was introduced last November. Its much heralded design was to stem the rising tide of mortgage possession actions.

The new pre-action protocol
Section I sets out the aims of the protocol together with the scope of its application.
The protocol is intended to have the following effect to:
 ensure that the lender and borrower act fairly and reasonably with each other in resolving any matters concerning arrears;
 encourage more pre-action contact between the lender

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll