header-logo header-logo

12 February 2009
Issue: 7356 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Stemming a rising tide?

Tom Bailey & Greg Williams consider the effectiveness of the new mortgage possession pre-action protocol

'There are no specific consequences where a party is in breach of the protocol'

As any practitioner who has witnessed a possession list in their local county court will know, claims for possession are rising steeply, thanks in no small part to the “credit crunch”. Statistics recently published by the Ministry of Justice state that during the third quarter of 2008, 38,511 possession claims were issued, resulting in 29,516 possession orders being made, of which 47% were suspended possession orders.
Following consultation, a mortgage possession pre-action protocol was introduced last November. Its much heralded design was to stem the rising tide of mortgage possession actions.

The new pre-action protocol
Section I sets out the aims of the protocol together with the scope of its application.
The protocol is intended to have the following effect to:
 ensure that the lender and borrower act fairly and reasonably with each other in resolving any matters concerning arrears;
 encourage more pre-action contact between the lender

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll