header-logo header-logo

25 January 2013 / Keith Patten
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Step back in time

Removing liability for health & safety regulation breaches would take us back to the 19th century, says Keith Patten

Imagine the following facts: Fireman Sam is on duty at a fire station. An emergency call is received that a woman is trapped under a heavy vehicle 300m from the fire station. The officer in charge directs Sam, and some of his colleagues, to attend the scene, along with a large and heavy jack standing on four wheels. The only vehicle available to transport the jack is an ordinary lorry with a plain floor and sides. There is nothing to which the jack can be secured, so Sam and his colleagues cling on to it to try to stop it from moving around in the back of the lorry. Shortly after leaving the fire station the driver is forced to apply the brakes sharply. Sam and his colleagues are unable to stop the jack from moving. As it does so, it strikes Sam’s ankle causing him a serious, career-threatening injury.

Current law

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll