header-logo header-logo

A step too far

08 June 2012 / Deborah Evans
Issue: 7517 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Deborah Evans questions the rationale behind the proposed portal extension

The consultation on the extension of the road traffic accident (RTA) claims process has left many of us confused. It’s hard to provide the answers when the questions keep changing. We are asked to suggest a new fixed-fee for claims within the portal (with a strong hint that it should be lower) for cases between £1,000 and £10,000, while at the same time hearing reports that the government is thinking of raising the small claims limit to £5,000 for personal injury cases. We know this would effectively empty the portal of all its existing claims because we know from data that 97% of claims which settle in the portal settle for under £3,500.

Hidden problem?

So where have the rest of the claims gone? Perhaps they settle outside the portal—after all, 47% of claims exit the system. Is it just that claims over the value of £3,500 require more work, taking in special damages and loss of earnings, or that they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll