header-logo header-logo

08 June 2012 / Deborah Evans
Issue: 7517 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

A step too far

Deborah Evans questions the rationale behind the proposed portal extension

The consultation on the extension of the road traffic accident (RTA) claims process has left many of us confused. It’s hard to provide the answers when the questions keep changing. We are asked to suggest a new fixed-fee for claims within the portal (with a strong hint that it should be lower) for cases between £1,000 and £10,000, while at the same time hearing reports that the government is thinking of raising the small claims limit to £5,000 for personal injury cases. We know this would effectively empty the portal of all its existing claims because we know from data that 97% of claims which settle in the portal settle for under £3,500.

Hidden problem?

So where have the rest of the claims gone? Perhaps they settle outside the portal—after all, 47% of claims exit the system. Is it just that claims over the value of £3,500 require more work, taking in special damages and loss of earnings, or that they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll