header-logo header-logo

08 June 2012 / Deborah Evans
Issue: 7517 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

A step too far

Deborah Evans questions the rationale behind the proposed portal extension

The consultation on the extension of the road traffic accident (RTA) claims process has left many of us confused. It’s hard to provide the answers when the questions keep changing. We are asked to suggest a new fixed-fee for claims within the portal (with a strong hint that it should be lower) for cases between £1,000 and £10,000, while at the same time hearing reports that the government is thinking of raising the small claims limit to £5,000 for personal injury cases. We know this would effectively empty the portal of all its existing claims because we know from data that 97% of claims which settle in the portal settle for under £3,500.

Hidden problem?

So where have the rest of the claims gone? Perhaps they settle outside the portal—after all, 47% of claims exit the system. Is it just that claims over the value of £3,500 require more work, taking in special damages and loss of earnings, or that they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll