header-logo header-logo

A step too far

08 June 2012 / Deborah Evans
Issue: 7517 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Deborah Evans questions the rationale behind the proposed portal extension

The consultation on the extension of the road traffic accident (RTA) claims process has left many of us confused. It’s hard to provide the answers when the questions keep changing. We are asked to suggest a new fixed-fee for claims within the portal (with a strong hint that it should be lower) for cases between £1,000 and £10,000, while at the same time hearing reports that the government is thinking of raising the small claims limit to £5,000 for personal injury cases. We know this would effectively empty the portal of all its existing claims because we know from data that 97% of claims which settle in the portal settle for under £3,500.

Hidden problem?

So where have the rest of the claims gone? Perhaps they settle outside the portal—after all, 47% of claims exit the system. Is it just that claims over the value of £3,500 require more work, taking in special damages and loss of earnings, or that they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
back-to-top-scroll