header-logo header-logo

24 January 2025 / George Hepburne Scott
Issue: 8101 / Categories: Features , Extradition , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Stepping into a foreign judge’s shoes?

204788
To what extent can an English extradition court take account of the prospect of early release overseas? George Hepburne Scott calls for clarity
  • Recent High Court extradition appeal decisions have considered the prospective application of discretionary early release in foreign jurisdictions and the impact this can or ought to have upon the weight to be attached to the public interest in extradition in the cases under consideration.
  • There has been an apparent lack of consensus among High Court judges on this issue, such that a test case has now been granted permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

An interesting aspect of extradition law is the consideration of the legal systems of foreign jurisdictions. This is most frequently done by reference to the dual-criminality test under ss 64 and 65 of the Extradition Act 2003—whereby the conduct for which extradition is sought (either through an accusation or a conviction) must also constitute a crime in England and Wales (‘the conduct test’).

However, other considerations of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll