header-logo header-logo

24 January 2025 / George Hepburne Scott
Issue: 8101 / Categories: Features , Extradition , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Stepping into a foreign judge’s shoes?

204788
To what extent can an English extradition court take account of the prospect of early release overseas? George Hepburne Scott calls for clarity
  • Recent High Court extradition appeal decisions have considered the prospective application of discretionary early release in foreign jurisdictions and the impact this can or ought to have upon the weight to be attached to the public interest in extradition in the cases under consideration.
  • There has been an apparent lack of consensus among High Court judges on this issue, such that a test case has now been granted permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

An interesting aspect of extradition law is the consideration of the legal systems of foreign jurisdictions. This is most frequently done by reference to the dual-criminality test under ss 64 and 65 of the Extradition Act 2003—whereby the conduct for which extradition is sought (either through an accusation or a conviction) must also constitute a crime in England and Wales (‘the conduct test’).

However, other considerations of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll