header-logo header-logo

23 October 2024
Issue: 8091 / Categories: Legal News , Public , In Court , Highways
printer mail-detail

Stones safe but case is lost

Stonehenge campaigners have lost their legal challenge against a road tunnel on the A303 near the ancient site—however, the plans have already been scrapped

Shortly after taking office in July, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the government was dropping the controversial proposals due to budget constraints. By then, however, Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site’s appeal had already been heard.

In a judgment handed down last week, R (Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site) v Secretary of State for Transport and others [2024] EWCA Civ 1227, the court dismissed the appeal, rejecting six of the seven grounds.

Save Stonehenge had argued that the government’s case for the 13km dual carriageway was based on a flawed analysis of figures, and could cause irreparable damage to a historic site featuring Bronze Age burial mounds and Neolithic monuments.

Handing down the judgment, the court stated its role was apply the law and ‘not to gauge the environmental or societal merits of the development proposed, or to second guess the decision-maker’s exercise of planning judgment’.

Issue: 8091 / Categories: Legal News , Public , In Court , Highways
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll