header-logo header-logo

11 March 2010 / Professor Dominic Regan
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Blogs , Practice areas
printer mail-detail

Strange but true

Dominic Regan casts a wry eye over some unusual cases..

When I was a little boy my mother took me to a talk given by a wise old man, Professor Ian Smith. Two things have always stayed with me. I had never heard profanities before and he said that in English law truth was stranger than anything one could ever invent. He was right as usual.

Over the years I have come across so many odd cases. Here are some of them. None are apocryphal. All are reported.

Our judiciary is the envy of the world. Read Garratt v Saxby (2004) 1 WLR 2152, [2004] All ER (D) 302 (Feb) and you will see why. The trial judge was inadvertently made aware of a payment into court at the start of the trial. This detail should only be revealed when all issues had been concluded. His ingenious solution? He ordered himself to forget it! I have a vision of the defendants saying you can’t do that and the judge asking “forget what?” Anyway,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll