header-logo header-logo

11 March 2010 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Blogs , Practice areas
printer mail-detail

Strange but true

Dominic Regan casts a wry eye over some unusual cases..

When I was a little boy my mother took me to a talk given by a wise old man, Professor Ian Smith. Two things have always stayed with me. I had never heard profanities before and he said that in English law truth was stranger than anything one could ever invent. He was right as usual.

Over the years I have come across so many odd cases. Here are some of them. None are apocryphal. All are reported.

Our judiciary is the envy of the world. Read Garratt v Saxby (2004) 1 WLR 2152, [2004] All ER (D) 302 (Feb) and you will see why. The trial judge was inadvertently made aware of a payment into court at the start of the trial. This detail should only be revealed when all issues had been concluded. His ingenious solution? He ordered himself to forget it! I have a vision of the defendants saying you can’t do that and the judge asking “forget what?” Anyway, it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll