header-logo header-logo

20 January 2010
Issue: 7401 / Categories: Legal News , Fees , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Straw proposes fee cut

Justice Secretary Jack Straw has proposed a dramatic cut to the success fees lawyers can charge for winning defamation cases, days after the publication of Jackson LJ’s final report.

Currently, lawyers can double their fee by charging a 100% uplift under conditional fee agreements (CFAs) in “no win, no fee” cases.
According to Straw, such generous fees are not justified in defamation cases due to their high success rate. Instead, he proposes that the success fee be no more than 10%.

The proposal, outlined in the Ministry of Justice consultation paper, Controlling Costs in Defamation Proceedings – Reducing Conditional Fee Agreement Success Fees, follows concerns that the cost of defending defamation proceedings is stymieing freedom of expression. Potentially ruinous legal costs are deterring the press from publishing articles that are in the public interest, or forcing them to settle rather than defend actions. Straw said: “Lawyers need to recover their costs and be rewarded for their efforts and the risks they undertake when providing people with access to justice in ‘no win no fee’ cases.

“But evidence suggests that the regular doubling of fees that currently takes place is simply not justified and the balance of costs between claimant and defendant needs to be reconsidered.”

“Sir Rupert Jackson’s comprehensive review of costs in the civil courts, which was published last week, proposed a broad range of recommendations for reform.  I welcome that substantial and detailed report and I look forward to considering the proposals in detail. But the case for an urgent interim measure for dealing with success fees in defamation cases has become clear.”

The consultation closes on 16 February 2010.
 

Issue: 7401 / Categories: Legal News , Fees , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll