header-logo header-logo

20 January 2010
Issue: 7401 / Categories: Legal News , Fees , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Straw proposes fee cut

Justice Secretary Jack Straw has proposed a dramatic cut to the success fees lawyers can charge for winning defamation cases, days after the publication of Jackson LJ’s final report.

Currently, lawyers can double their fee by charging a 100% uplift under conditional fee agreements (CFAs) in “no win, no fee” cases.
According to Straw, such generous fees are not justified in defamation cases due to their high success rate. Instead, he proposes that the success fee be no more than 10%.

The proposal, outlined in the Ministry of Justice consultation paper, Controlling Costs in Defamation Proceedings – Reducing Conditional Fee Agreement Success Fees, follows concerns that the cost of defending defamation proceedings is stymieing freedom of expression. Potentially ruinous legal costs are deterring the press from publishing articles that are in the public interest, or forcing them to settle rather than defend actions. Straw said: “Lawyers need to recover their costs and be rewarded for their efforts and the risks they undertake when providing people with access to justice in ‘no win no fee’ cases.

“But evidence suggests that the regular doubling of fees that currently takes place is simply not justified and the balance of costs between claimant and defendant needs to be reconsidered.”

“Sir Rupert Jackson’s comprehensive review of costs in the civil courts, which was published last week, proposed a broad range of recommendations for reform.  I welcome that substantial and detailed report and I look forward to considering the proposals in detail. But the case for an urgent interim measure for dealing with success fees in defamation cases has become clear.”

The consultation closes on 16 February 2010.
 

Issue: 7401 / Categories: Legal News , Fees , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll