header-logo header-logo

04 October 2012
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Stress in the City

Concern over profit margins

City law firms have expressed concern about their profit margins due to increasing pressure from clients to lower their fees, according to a recent survey of finance directors at top-100 firms.

More than half of finance directors say pressure from clients to discount fees will pose a high risk to profitability. They are also concerned about the slowdown in corporate work, while a surprising one in five finance directors views increased competition created by the Legal Services Act as a high risk.

Generally, the Legal Services Act, which permits external ownership and investment in law firms, has been seen as a threat to high street firms rather than the Square Mile.

According to Sweet & Maxwell, which conducted the survey, City firms may be concerned that the commoditised elements of their practices could suffer from the extra competition, or that investment of private equity money in smaller commercial law firms may increase competition for higher margin work.

Managing director Teri Hawksworth says: “The big question is how high up the league table of law firms the ripples from the Legal Services Act spread. While none of the Magic Circle firms we spoke to identify the Act as a risk, we are seeing more firms outside the top 10 paying more serious attention to its impact.”

Issue: 7532 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll