header-logo header-logo

15 March 2013 / Karen O’Sullivan
Issue: 7552 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Stressing the point

97766624_1

Karen O’Sullivan provides an update on cases involving breach of duty & non-tortious causes

Claims for personal injury arising from stress at work are difficult and complex, often with minute consideration of specific facts as to what the employer did or didn’t do. One complexity is the common scenario where other factors in the claimant’s life have contributed to the breakdown in mental health.

This issue was recently visited in the Court of Appeal case of Brown v London Borough of Richmond-upon-Thames [2012] All ER (D) 278 (Nov), although the court failed to produce definitive guidance as to how to treat the interaction between the employer’s breach of duty and non-tortious causes (in Mr Brown’s case, his marriage breakdown).

Unfortunately we have two separate dicta on the issue which are explicitly different, both from the Court of Appeal, and both obiter. In Hatton v Sunderland [2002] 2 All ER 1, Hale LJ suggested that the court should consider first whether the employer’s breach of duty was such that absent the breach,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll