header-logo header-logo

Strict regulations on new gambling ads

16 March 2007
Issue: 7264 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Advertising restrictions on TV and radio adverts for online gambling sites, casinos and betting shops are to be lifted.

The new rules come into operation in September as part of the Gambling Act 2005, and are accompanied by strict regulations announced this week by the Committee of Advertising Practice and the Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice.

Adverts must not portray, condone or encourage gambling behaviour that is socially irresponsible or that could lead to financial, social or emotional harm. The Advertising Standards Authority will administer the codes, respond to public concerns and ensure compliance.

Hilary Stewart-Jones, a partner at Berwin Leighton Paisner specialising in the gaming sector, thinks the regulations will work as companies will have to face their own regulator as well as the advertising regulator.

“The regulations are strict enough,” she says. “It’s all about the good faith of the people constrained by the regulations. Companies could still have effective advertising, raising their brand awareness, within the constraints of the regulations. However, you will always have some unscrupulous operators who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll