header-logo header-logo

05 August 2011 / Stephen Levinson
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Opinion , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

Strike force

istock_000013079680medium_4

Stephen Levinson ponders the legalities of restraining strikes

What is a legitimate strike? We have been arguing about this since Disraeli introduced the concept of trade union immunity in 1875.

The threat of an increasing number of strikes is obviously real. If “something must be done”, the difficult questions are where should the boundaries of legitimacy be drawn and how should they be enforced? So far, the answers put forward by politicians have been mechanistic rather than principled.

Politicians speak out

Business secretary Vince Cable threatens unspecified laws to curb union power. Ed Miliband told the Guardian that strikes should be a last resort. A backbencher has proposed a Bill banning strikes in the emergency and transport sectors and Boris Johnson, the beloved mayor of London, wants a ban on any strike that fails to secure the backing of 50% of those able to vote.

Unions and their supporters complain endlessly that there is no right to strike in the UK, only a regime of immunities. Various shifts in statute and case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll