header-logo header-logo

05 August 2011 / Stephen Levinson
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Opinion , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

Strike force

istock_000013079680medium_4

Stephen Levinson ponders the legalities of restraining strikes

What is a legitimate strike? We have been arguing about this since Disraeli introduced the concept of trade union immunity in 1875.

The threat of an increasing number of strikes is obviously real. If “something must be done”, the difficult questions are where should the boundaries of legitimacy be drawn and how should they be enforced? So far, the answers put forward by politicians have been mechanistic rather than principled.

Politicians speak out

Business secretary Vince Cable threatens unspecified laws to curb union power. Ed Miliband told the Guardian that strikes should be a last resort. A backbencher has proposed a Bill banning strikes in the emergency and transport sectors and Boris Johnson, the beloved mayor of London, wants a ban on any strike that fails to secure the backing of 50% of those able to vote.

Unions and their supporters complain endlessly that there is no right to strike in the UK, only a regime of immunities. Various shifts in statute and case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll