header-logo header-logo

Strike force

05 August 2011 / Stephen Levinson
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Opinion , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail
istock_000013079680medium_4

Stephen Levinson ponders the legalities of restraining strikes

What is a legitimate strike? We have been arguing about this since Disraeli introduced the concept of trade union immunity in 1875.

The threat of an increasing number of strikes is obviously real. If “something must be done”, the difficult questions are where should the boundaries of legitimacy be drawn and how should they be enforced? So far, the answers put forward by politicians have been mechanistic rather than principled.

Politicians speak out

Business secretary Vince Cable threatens unspecified laws to curb union power. Ed Miliband told the Guardian that strikes should be a last resort. A backbencher has proposed a Bill banning strikes in the emergency and transport sectors and Boris Johnson, the beloved mayor of London, wants a ban on any strike that fails to secure the backing of 50% of those able to vote.

Unions and their supporters complain endlessly that there is no right to strike in the UK, only a regime of immunities. Various shifts in statute and case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll