header-logo header-logo

18 July 2014 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7615 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Striking a fair balance

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide an update on disputed probate cases

In King v Dubrey and others [2014] EWHC 2083 (Ch) the deceased made a will in 1998 leaving £19,000 in legacies to friends and relatives, and her residuary estate to a number of animal charities. The main asset in her estate was a property in Hertfordshire, worth approximately £350,000 at the time of trial, into which her nephew, Mr King, moved to look after her in 2007.

On 19 November 2010, 4 February 2011 and 24 March 2011, the deceased prepared various documents to the effect that King should have the property when she died. None of the documents constituted a valid will in law. King stated that, in around late 2010/early 2011, the deceased presented him with the deeds to the property and said to him: “This will be yours when I go.” King claimed to have taken the deeds and put them into his wardrobe.

King claimed that the deceased, who died on 10 April 2011, had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll