header-logo header-logo

Striking a fair balance

18 July 2014 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7615 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide an update on disputed probate cases

In King v Dubrey and others [2014] EWHC 2083 (Ch) the deceased made a will in 1998 leaving £19,000 in legacies to friends and relatives, and her residuary estate to a number of animal charities. The main asset in her estate was a property in Hertfordshire, worth approximately £350,000 at the time of trial, into which her nephew, Mr King, moved to look after her in 2007.

On 19 November 2010, 4 February 2011 and 24 March 2011, the deceased prepared various documents to the effect that King should have the property when she died. None of the documents constituted a valid will in law. King stated that, in around late 2010/early 2011, the deceased presented him with the deeds to the property and said to him: “This will be yours when I go.” King claimed to have taken the deeds and put them into his wardrobe.

King claimed that the deceased, who died on 10 April 2011, had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll