header-logo header-logo

19 July 2024 / Andrew Young
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Features , Tort , Personal injury , Damages
printer mail-detail

Substance trumps procedure

182210
Tort in Spain, claim in England—should interest be awarded at the higher rate as stipulated by Spanish law? Andrew Young reports
  • Covers the Court of Appeal decision in Nicholls v Mapfre, concerning claims brought in England against Spanish insurance company Mapfre for accidents in Spain. Liability was admitted and damages assessed under Spanish law.
  • Addresses question of whether the English court should award interest at the higher rate stipulated by Spanish law (art 20(4) of Spanish Insurance Contract Act 50/1980).
  • The answer might depend on whether the award of interest was substantive (Spanish law) or procedural (either English or Spanish, at the court’s discretion).
  • The Court of Appeal held the interest payable was a matter of substance, so the higher Spanish rate applied.

On 27 June 2024 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in three conjoined appeals (Nicholls v Mapfre Espana Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros SA [2024] EWCA Civ 718, [2024] All ER (D) 28 (Jul)), all of which were brought by the Spanish insurance company

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll