header-logo header-logo

07 February 2025 / Amanda Smallcombe
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Inheritance tax
printer mail-detail

Success stories?

207236
Amanda Smallcombe examines success fees in claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
  • Discusses Hirachand v Hirachand and another [2024] UKSC 43 in relation to success fees incurred by a claimant under a conditional fee arrangement.
  • Considers the implications of the Supreme Court decision in that case, for both solicitors and claimants.

On 18 December 2024, the Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited judgment in the case of Hirachand v Hirachand and another [2024] UKSC 43, settling the issue of whether success fees incurred by a claimant under a conditional fee agreement (CFA) are recoverable as part of the substantive award in claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the 1975 Act).

The case

Navinchandra Hirachand (the deceased) died in 2016 and his wife, Nalina Hirachand (the widow), inherited his entire estate under the terms of his will. The widow was in poor health, living in a care home, where she would remain for life. The deceased’s daughter, Sheila Hirachand, had severe mental

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll