header-logo header-logo

Success stories?

07 February 2025 / Amanda Smallcombe
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Inheritance tax
printer mail-detail
207236
Amanda Smallcombe examines success fees in claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
  • Discusses Hirachand v Hirachand and another [2024] UKSC 43 in relation to success fees incurred by a claimant under a conditional fee arrangement.
  • Considers the implications of the Supreme Court decision in that case, for both solicitors and claimants.

On 18 December 2024, the Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited judgment in the case of Hirachand v Hirachand and another [2024] UKSC 43, settling the issue of whether success fees incurred by a claimant under a conditional fee agreement (CFA) are recoverable as part of the substantive award in claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the 1975 Act).

The case

Navinchandra Hirachand (the deceased) died in 2016 and his wife, Nalina Hirachand (the widow), inherited his entire estate under the terms of his will. The widow was in poor health, living in a care home, where she would remain for life. The deceased’s daughter, Sheila Hirachand, had severe mental

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll