header-logo header-logo

07 February 2025 / Amanda Smallcombe
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Inheritance tax
printer mail-detail

Success stories?

207236
Amanda Smallcombe examines success fees in claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
  • Discusses Hirachand v Hirachand and another [2024] UKSC 43 in relation to success fees incurred by a claimant under a conditional fee arrangement.
  • Considers the implications of the Supreme Court decision in that case, for both solicitors and claimants.

On 18 December 2024, the Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited judgment in the case of Hirachand v Hirachand and another [2024] UKSC 43, settling the issue of whether success fees incurred by a claimant under a conditional fee agreement (CFA) are recoverable as part of the substantive award in claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the 1975 Act).

The case

Navinchandra Hirachand (the deceased) died in 2016 and his wife, Nalina Hirachand (the widow), inherited his entire estate under the terms of his will. The widow was in poor health, living in a care home, where she would remain for life. The deceased’s daughter, Sheila Hirachand, had severe mental

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll