header-logo header-logo

19 July 2016
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Sue Chadwick & Stuart Tym—Birketts

Firm boosts planning & environment law team

Birketts has enhanced its planning and environmental law team with the recruitment of two highly-experienced appointments. Sue Chadwick (senior associate) and Stuart Tym (associate) both come with a wealth of knowledge and experience having advised a number of local planning authorities for many years.

Commenting on her appointment, Sue said “I am thrilled to be joining Birketts specialist planning law department which is recognised as a market leader by the legal directories. The team has built a fantastic reputation over the years advising a diverse mix of clients, including local authorities, residential developers, landowners and waste operators. I can’t wait to get stuck in.”

Stuart added: “I was very keen to join Birketts; the firm is expanding due to increasing activity throughout the region and has seen a growing number of instructions, predominantly from developers and landowners but also from local authorities in recent times. It’s a really exciting time to join.”

Tom Newcombe, partner and head of Birketts’ planning and environment team adds: “I’m delighted to welcome Sue and Stuart to Birketts so quickly after the appointment of Nicola Doole. Sue has over 25 years' experience in both the public and private sector and advises on all aspects of planning law with particular expertise in delivery of large scale projects and corporate governance. Her experience includes acting as deputy monitoring officer at Essex County council, project manager of the Grand Arcade shopping centre in Cambridge city centre and corporate growth manager for the Southern Fringe and other growth sites in Cambridge.”

Tom continues: “Stuart also has great experience, having specialised in planning, environmental and highways law for over a decade. He has particular expertise in contentious planning, including enforcement matters, complex s.106 agreements and renewable energy projects. Both appointments strengthen our team and demonstrate our commitment to meeting our clients’ needs. It was essential that we recruited high calibre personnel to maintain the standards and approach that our clients have come to expect from Birketts.”

Both Sue and Stuart will be based in the Cambridge office but support colleagues across Birketts’ four offices: Cambridge, Chelmsford, Ipswich and Norwich.

Issue: 7708 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll