header-logo header-logo

05 January 2012
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Suicide to be legalised?

Commission proposes legal framework for assisted suicide

Assisted suicide could be offered to terminally ill people, with effective legal safeguards, according to a Demos Commission chaired by Lord Falconer QC, the former Lord Chancellor.

The Commission on Assisted Dying has proposed a legal framework under which a dying person, following the assessment and support of two independent doctors, can be prescribed a dose of medication to end their life.

Its 400-page report, published this week following an extensive year-long review, sets out eligibility criteria including that the person is at least 18, has a terminal illness, is making a voluntary choice, has the mental capacity to make that choice, and that their decision is not impaired by a mental health problem such as depression or by pressure from friends or relatives.

However, the Commission does not advocate euthanasia—one of the recommended criteria is that the person is able to take the medication themselves so they can clearly demonstrate their agreement.

It expressed concern that assisting suicide is an “amateur activity”, with no safeguards in place for those who seek, or feel under pressure to seek, assistance.

The Commission sets out safeguards for any future legislation, including ensuring the person has been fully informed of all other treatment and care options, that there is safe storage and transportation of lethal medication, and that there is monitoring and regulatory oversight by a national monitoring commission with investigatory powers.

Currently, assisting someone’s death is a criminal offence, although there have been no prosecutions since the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) published their policy on the issue in February 2010. More than 40 cases of assisted suicide have been reported to the DPP since then.

Issue: 7495 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll