header-logo header-logo

12 December 2025 / Alexa Payet , John Critchley
Issue: 8143 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Health
printer mail-detail

Suicide & the administration of estates

238292
How do the courts treat a deceased's assets in cases of suicide? Alexa Payet & John Critchley examine three cases
  • Under the forfeiture rule, a person ought not to profit from their own wrong, so a person who unlawfully kills another is by virtue of the rule precluded from inheriting the estate of the deceased.
  • David Peace’s friend Tim travelled with him to Dignitas. Mr Peace also left his flat to Tim in his will. In David Peace (unreported) (2025), the court concluded that the executor could lawfully distribute the estate in the manner requested by the beneficiaries.

Social attitudes towards suicide have changed over time and are complex. The same is true of the legal architecture surrounding suicide. Further law reform concerning suicide is currently under consideration in Parliament, and the national political, moral and legal debate is hotly contested with the ultimate outcome uncertain.

Section 1 of the Suicide Act 1961 abolished the crime of suicide but, arguably paradoxically, provided by s 2

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll