header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

suitable character?

In brief

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) wants practitioners’ views on who should be allowed to enter the profession. While the Solicitors Act 1974 and various regulations oblige the SRA to ensure that, before admission, people are of the character and suitability to be a solicitor, there is no definition of character and suitability. Draft guidelines were issued in June 2006 and piloted among the profession. The SRA now wants solicitors’ views on how the guidelines can be improved. They guidelines are available at www.sra.org.uk and the consultation closes on 27 April 2007.

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll