header-logo header-logo

Summary judgment

04 December 2008 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

JANNA PURDIE provides practical guidance for  practitioners involved in summary judgment applications

References

Jacobs v Skidmore [2008] All ER (D) 258 (Nov)
Jacobs v Skidmore [2008] All ER (D) 258 (Nov)
CPR 24

Summary judgment
There are obvious steps parties can take to make the court process easier and  strengthen their case. Mr Justice Coulson, in a judgment providing valuable guidance  to practitioners, has highlighted some of these. While some apply specifi cally  to summary judgment applications others apply equally well to other forms of  applications.

Facts of the case

The claimant undertook quantity surveying and project management for a  construction project under a consultancy agreement. The defendant terminated that  agreement and the claimant brought proceedings for unpaid invoices of more than  £4m.

The claimant applied for summary judgment on three of the invoices totalling  £755,643.60. The application was resisted. The time estimate was two hours with no  indication that pre-reading was required. The evidence adduced comprised 10 files, and  included lengthy statements. The application took three days of court time.

The summary judgment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll