header-logo header-logo

13 February 2020 / Keith Wilding
Issue: 7874 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Support Act

15681
Keith Wilding reflects on the steps needed to bring about an ‘enduring legacy of mental health support’ 
  • The review proposes a cultural change in the assessment and treatment of mental ill-health.
  • The tension between liberty and autonomy.
  • Recommendations for a substantial investment in resources in mental health services.

It is now well over a year since the last government published the final report of the review of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) by Professor Sir Simon Wessely and his team (‘Modernising the Mental Health Act— Increasing choice, reducing compulsion’, December 2018, https://bit.ly/2uAQ8WP). With a new government in place, there is revived hope that many of the key recommendations for change, outlined below, can now be driven forward.

The review notes that severe mental illness has been overlooked in the past and that there is a clear case for change: ‘[T]he rate of detention is rising, the patient’s voice is lost within the process….there is unacceptable overrepresentation of black and ethnic minority ethnic groups amongst people detained, and people with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll