header-logo header-logo

13 February 2020 / Keith Wilding
Issue: 7874 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Support Act

15681
Keith Wilding reflects on the steps needed to bring about an ‘enduring legacy of mental health support’ 
  • The review proposes a cultural change in the assessment and treatment of mental ill-health.
  • The tension between liberty and autonomy.
  • Recommendations for a substantial investment in resources in mental health services.

It is now well over a year since the last government published the final report of the review of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) by Professor Sir Simon Wessely and his team (‘Modernising the Mental Health Act— Increasing choice, reducing compulsion’, December 2018, https://bit.ly/2uAQ8WP). With a new government in place, there is revived hope that many of the key recommendations for change, outlined below, can now be driven forward.

The review notes that severe mental illness has been overlooked in the past and that there is a clear case for change: ‘[T]he rate of detention is rising, the patient’s voice is lost within the process….there is unacceptable overrepresentation of black and ethnic minority ethnic groups amongst people detained, and people with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll