header-logo header-logo

Support for new child care target

14 February 2013
Issue: 7548 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Proposed 26-week target receives support of Resolution

Family lawyers’ group Resolution has expressed support for the introduction of a 26-week target for care cases, but warned the needs of children must remain paramount.

The Children and Families Bill, published last week, implements David Norgrove’s Family Justice Review recommendation for a 26-week target in child care proceedings. Judges will have discretion to extend this where necessary, as long as the case comes back to court within eight weeks.

Harjinder Kaur, the local authority representative for Resolution’s children committee, says the courts are already starting to put the 26-week deadline into practice so there will not be a sudden change overnight when it becomes law.

“The courts want to achieve a change in culture,” she says.

“Since April 2012 each case has been tracked, there is an initial hearing to determine the immediate placement for the child, and then a case-management hearing within weeks of the initial hearing, where it is recorded whether the case can meet the 26-week target and, if not, the reasons. Previously the target for completing a case was 40 weeks and cases could take a year or more.”

“A lot of delays have been caused by waiting for experts such as a psychologist or independent social worker,” she says. As of 1 February, however, experts can only be instructed where “necessary”.

Kaur says Resolution agrees that making decisions within 26 weeks will be in the interests of most children, but hopes judges will retain discretion to allow cases more time.

Local authorities will need to complete their assessments prior to court, whereas at the moment they go to court at an earlier stage, she says, which may mean cases take longer to reach court, even if they make faster progress once there.

Issue: 7548 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll