header-logo header-logo

24 July 2024
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Education , Training & education
printer mail-detail

Supreme Court calling students, pupils & trainees

The Supreme Court has launched an essay competition to mark its 15th anniversary

Registered university students, aspiring lawyers, pupils and trainees with UK-based firms or chambers are invited to submit essays of no longer than 1,500 words on: ‘As the Supreme Court approaches its 15th anniversary, what reflections would you offer on its role and achievements?’

Lady Simler, Justice of the Supreme Court, will select the winning entry. First prize will win a meeting with Lady Simler, a tour of the court, and a UK Supreme Court coffee table book.

To enter, email your essay to enquiries@supremecourt.uk, citing 'Essay Competition' in the subject line. The closing date is 30 September 2024.

Essays will be judged anonymously. Before hitting send, please read the entry criteria to give your entry its best chance.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll