header-logo header-logo

Supreme Court to visit the “Auld Reekie”

10 April 2017
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Supreme Court is heading north in June to hear three cases in Edinburgh, and has now confirmed its dates.

The court will sit as a panel of five judges in the City Chambers, home of the City of Edinburgh Council, with Lord Neuberger, President of the Supreme Court, presiding. Members of the public are welcome to attend, and seating arrangements have been arranged for 120 people on a “first come, first served” basis. The proceedings will be live streamed via the Supreme Court website.

On 12 June, 11am–4pm, the court will consider the evidential burden on the state when disrupting “sham marriages”, in Sadovska and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department.

On 13 June, 10.30am–4pm, it will hear Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Planning Authority v Elsick Development Company Limited. This appeal concerns the correct legal test to be applied when assessing planning obligations, and the extent to which planning authorities are bound to comply with national planning policy.

On 14 June, 10.30am–4pm and 15 June, 10.30am–1pm, it will consider the obligation on the state to assist the rehabilitation of determinate sentence prisoners, in Brown v The Scottish Ministers. Lord Carloway will sit on the panel to hear this appeal.

Some of the justices will then head to the Law Society of Scotland headquarters, where they have agreed to speak at a professional development session. 

Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll