header-logo header-logo

10 April 2017
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Supreme Court to visit the “Auld Reekie”

The Supreme Court is heading north in June to hear three cases in Edinburgh, and has now confirmed its dates.

The court will sit as a panel of five judges in the City Chambers, home of the City of Edinburgh Council, with Lord Neuberger, President of the Supreme Court, presiding. Members of the public are welcome to attend, and seating arrangements have been arranged for 120 people on a “first come, first served” basis. The proceedings will be live streamed via the Supreme Court website.

On 12 June, 11am–4pm, the court will consider the evidential burden on the state when disrupting “sham marriages”, in Sadovska and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department.

On 13 June, 10.30am–4pm, it will hear Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Planning Authority v Elsick Development Company Limited. This appeal concerns the correct legal test to be applied when assessing planning obligations, and the extent to which planning authorities are bound to comply with national planning policy.

On 14 June, 10.30am–4pm and 15 June, 10.30am–1pm, it will consider the obligation on the state to assist the rehabilitation of determinate sentence prisoners, in Brown v The Scottish Ministers. Lord Carloway will sit on the panel to hear this appeal.

Some of the justices will then head to the Law Society of Scotland headquarters, where they have agreed to speak at a professional development session. 

Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll