header-logo header-logo

10 April 2017
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Supreme Court to visit the “Auld Reekie”

The Supreme Court is heading north in June to hear three cases in Edinburgh, and has now confirmed its dates.

The court will sit as a panel of five judges in the City Chambers, home of the City of Edinburgh Council, with Lord Neuberger, President of the Supreme Court, presiding. Members of the public are welcome to attend, and seating arrangements have been arranged for 120 people on a “first come, first served” basis. The proceedings will be live streamed via the Supreme Court website.

On 12 June, 11am–4pm, the court will consider the evidential burden on the state when disrupting “sham marriages”, in Sadovska and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department.

On 13 June, 10.30am–4pm, it will hear Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Planning Authority v Elsick Development Company Limited. This appeal concerns the correct legal test to be applied when assessing planning obligations, and the extent to which planning authorities are bound to comply with national planning policy.

On 14 June, 10.30am–4pm and 15 June, 10.30am–1pm, it will consider the obligation on the state to assist the rehabilitation of determinate sentence prisoners, in Brown v The Scottish Ministers. Lord Carloway will sit on the panel to hear this appeal.

Some of the justices will then head to the Law Society of Scotland headquarters, where they have agreed to speak at a professional development session. 

Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll