header-logo header-logo

Supreme numbers: a year in review

12 January 2018
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-detail
nlj_7776_cover

The Supreme Court heard a record 82 cases last year, beating the record set in 2013 by one.

Lady Hale delivered the most judgments (20), while Lord Hughes delivered the fewest (nine). Dissent was expressed in only 12 cases. Lords Kerr and Clarke dissented four times. Lords Carnwath and Hughes dissented three times. Only Lord Sumption did not dissent at all.

Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Brice Dickson, Queen’s University Belfast, notes that more than a quarter of the Court’s cases involved interveners. A total of 48 interveners contributed to 24 cases.

Two references were made to the European Court of Justice. The longest judgment, concerning British soldiers’ detention powers in Afghanistan and Iraq, ran to 360 paragraphs.

In a busy year, the Court handed down decisions on major constitutional matters such as the Article 50 process for Brexit, welcomed its first female President, Lady Hale and appointed three new Justices, Lords Lloyd-Jones and Briggs and its second female Justice, Lady Black.

This year, a further three retirements are due—Lords Mance, Hughes and Sumption—again changing the composition of the court. 

Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Private wealth and tax offering bolstered by partner hire

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
back-to-top-scroll