header-logo header-logo

12 January 2018
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-detail

Supreme numbers: a year in review

nlj_7776_cover

The Supreme Court heard a record 82 cases last year, beating the record set in 2013 by one.

Lady Hale delivered the most judgments (20), while Lord Hughes delivered the fewest (nine). Dissent was expressed in only 12 cases. Lords Kerr and Clarke dissented four times. Lords Carnwath and Hughes dissented three times. Only Lord Sumption did not dissent at all.

Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Brice Dickson, Queen’s University Belfast, notes that more than a quarter of the Court’s cases involved interveners. A total of 48 interveners contributed to 24 cases.

Two references were made to the European Court of Justice. The longest judgment, concerning British soldiers’ detention powers in Afghanistan and Iraq, ran to 360 paragraphs.

In a busy year, the Court handed down decisions on major constitutional matters such as the Article 50 process for Brexit, welcomed its first female President, Lady Hale and appointed three new Justices, Lords Lloyd-Jones and Briggs and its second female Justice, Lady Black.

This year, a further three retirements are due—Lords Mance, Hughes and Sumption—again changing the composition of the court. 

Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll