header-logo header-logo

12 January 2018
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-detail

Supreme numbers: a year in review

nlj_7776_cover

The Supreme Court heard a record 82 cases last year, beating the record set in 2013 by one.

Lady Hale delivered the most judgments (20), while Lord Hughes delivered the fewest (nine). Dissent was expressed in only 12 cases. Lords Kerr and Clarke dissented four times. Lords Carnwath and Hughes dissented three times. Only Lord Sumption did not dissent at all.

Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Brice Dickson, Queen’s University Belfast, notes that more than a quarter of the Court’s cases involved interveners. A total of 48 interveners contributed to 24 cases.

Two references were made to the European Court of Justice. The longest judgment, concerning British soldiers’ detention powers in Afghanistan and Iraq, ran to 360 paragraphs.

In a busy year, the Court handed down decisions on major constitutional matters such as the Article 50 process for Brexit, welcomed its first female President, Lady Hale and appointed three new Justices, Lords Lloyd-Jones and Briggs and its second female Justice, Lady Black.

This year, a further three retirements are due—Lords Mance, Hughes and Sumption—again changing the composition of the court. 

Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll