header-logo header-logo

Survey reveals fee income rises

22 October 2015
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

PwC reports marked difference between the fortunes of mid-tier & top-tier firms

Lawyers are crunching numbers after PwC published its annual Top 100 law firm survey.

The 2015 survey uncovered a marked difference between the fortunes of mid-tier and top-tier firms. While fee income is generally up at 82% of law firms (compared to 70% last year) only half the Top 10 enjoyed UK fee income growth.

Profits per equity partner for the top 11-25 law firms increased by 17% (to £641,000), while the 3.5% rise at the Top 10 firms (to £1,067,000) was mainly driven by reductions in the number of equity partners. Top 10 firms’ revenues were also reduced by 3.5% due to Euro exchange rate movement.

The survey suggests that firms’ international operations are diluting their profitability—UK profits per partner at the Top 10 firms are 75% above that of their international colleagues.

As far as profit margins are concerned, the average margin is nearly 40% at Top 10 firms, 29% at Top 11-25 firms, and 24.5% for Top 26-50, while the margin for Top 51-100 firms has reduced by three per cent to 21%.

David Snell, partner and leader of PwC’s Law Firm Advisory Group, says: “Our 2015 Law Firms’ Survey is set in the context of a recovering UK market, but with ongoing challenging macro-economic conditions for global law firms.

“The strength of sterling against the euro has adversely impacted many firms’ international performance on a sterling basis—the basis upon which most firms distribute their profits to partners. However, the UK has enjoyed a more buoyant deals market, greater levels of regulatory activity and an active real estate sector.

“These factors are reflected in our survey, which shows a somewhat disappointing performance from the Top 10 firms, while at the same time a resurgent Top 11-25 who seem to have re-focused their strategic intent.

“Mid-tier City firms in particular have performed well through a combination of sensible lateral hiring programmes, M&A and a focus on cost control and key metrics such as chargeable hours. However, a slow-down in litigation, and difficult conditions in some industry sectors, have been a drag on performance for some in the Top 26-50.”

Issue: 7673 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll