header-logo header-logo

11 October 2018 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7812 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Suspicionless stop & search: a necessary evil?

Neil Parpworth considers the current arguments and sensitivities surrounding the use of stop and search

  • Stop and search can be authorised for up to 24 hours by an inspector under s 60, Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.
  • Looks at the ‘find rate’, the ‘hit rate’ and the history of its use as well as the current context.
  • Asserts that increasing its use can escalate tensions therefore it must be confined to the use for which it was intended, gang violence, and used sparingly.

The BBC recently reported that the Metropolitan Police Force was intending to use stop and search powers under s 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 to combat the potential problem of knife crime at the Notting Hill Carnival. Within a day or two of the relevant authorisation being granted, the Centre for Social Justice published a report, ‘It can be stopped: a proven blueprint to stop violence and tackle gang and related offending in London and beyond’ (August

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll