header-logo header-logo

Suspicionless stop & search: a necessary evil?

11 October 2018 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7812 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Neil Parpworth considers the current arguments and sensitivities surrounding the use of stop and search

  • Stop and search can be authorised for up to 24 hours by an inspector under s 60, Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.
  • Looks at the ‘find rate’, the ‘hit rate’ and the history of its use as well as the current context.
  • Asserts that increasing its use can escalate tensions therefore it must be confined to the use for which it was intended, gang violence, and used sparingly.

The BBC recently reported that the Metropolitan Police Force was intending to use stop and search powers under s 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 to combat the potential problem of knife crime at the Notting Hill Carnival. Within a day or two of the relevant authorisation being granted, the Centre for Social Justice published a report, ‘It can be stopped: a proven blueprint to stop violence and tackle gang and related offending in London and beyond’ (August

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll