header-logo header-logo

Suspicionless stop & search: a necessary evil?

11 October 2018 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7812 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Neil Parpworth considers the current arguments and sensitivities surrounding the use of stop and search

  • Stop and search can be authorised for up to 24 hours by an inspector under s 60, Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.
  • Looks at the ‘find rate’, the ‘hit rate’ and the history of its use as well as the current context.
  • Asserts that increasing its use can escalate tensions therefore it must be confined to the use for which it was intended, gang violence, and used sparingly.

The BBC recently reported that the Metropolitan Police Force was intending to use stop and search powers under s 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 to combat the potential problem of knife crime at the Notting Hill Carnival. Within a day or two of the relevant authorisation being granted, the Centre for Social Justice published a report, ‘It can be stopped: a proven blueprint to stop violence and tackle gang and related offending in London and beyond’ (August

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll